In recent years, the term "Clemsoning" has become synonymous with a team shockingly losing a game in which they were large favorites. While the origins of attributing the phrase to Clemson aren't concrete, Clemson has experienced more than its fair share of mind boggling losses, and it may have started with their 2 TD loss to Georgia Tech in 2011.
Related: West Virginia just scored again!
But this is the ACC! There's wealth to be spread! This is the conference that gave us this:
And this:
And this:
Thanks to Prediction Machine's Trend Machine, I was able to easily pull all ACC conference games since 2011 (the year "Clemsoning" appears to have started) and look at how often the underdog won, and what the payoff would've been had you bet on that team. If you had simply bet underdogs against the spread, you would've won 52% of the time, which would've been a losing strategy (you need to win 52.38% of spread bets to break even). But we don't care about that! We want straight up victories, the kind that lead to celebrations like this!
The underdog won the game outright 29.13% of the time, which is quite a bit more than the average of around 20.43% (see: "Line (updated)"). Had you blindly bet the underdog in each game, you would've returned a profit of +910 units, which equates to a 3.96% ROI over the past 4 years. So not that much. However, the emotional return is priceless:
